Don’t be surprised if the mainstream media seems to be throwing up all kinds of stories and distractions in light of the latest revelations from John Durham’s report, which reveal that the FBI actually employed Russian intelligence in a lame attempt to disrupt the Trump administration.
Rather ironic that the FBI is willing to stoop to employing Russian intelligence in an effort to undermine Trump, especially since the mainstream media claimed (falsely) that Trump colluded with the Russians for years.
On the contrary, it appears that American intelligence agencies did.
Which is abundantly clear in the latest updates from Durham.
“In March 2017, the FBI signed the defendant up as a paid confidential human source of the FBI. The FBI terminated its source relationship with the defendant in October 2020. As alleged in further detail below, the defendant lied to FBI agents during several of these interviews,” Durham wrote.
That “paid confidential informant” is Igor Danchenko, a Russian intelligence officer who has since been exposed for his cozy ties to the Clinton cartel.
In other words, the FBI employed a Russian intelligence officer for over 3.5 years, whose main purpose appeared to be feeding false information about his connections to the Clintons in a bid to undermine Trump.
Astonishingly, Danchenko was employed by the FBI despite the agency’s awareness of his links to Russian intelligence, which means that the agency was more than aware of his troubling connections before deciding to pay him a fortune for spreading lies.
“In late 2008, while the defendant was employed by a prominent think tank in Washington, D.C., the defendant engaged two fellow employees about whether one of the employees might be willing or able in the future to provide classified information in exchange for money,” Durham continued.
In other words, it is abundantly clear that Danchenko is totally corruptible and purchasable, which meant that he was precisely the type of Russian intelligence officer Ms. Hillary Clinton needed in her efforts to hurt Trump.
Back in 2008, the FBI apparently did its job more objectively (these were the pre-Obama days, after all), and realized the danger that Danchenko posed to U.S. intelligence and the government generally.
“Based on this information, the FBI initiated a ‘preliminary investigation’ into the defendant. The FBI converted its investigation into a ‘full investigation’ after learning that the defendant (1) had been identified as an associate of two FBI counterintelligence subjects and (2) had previous contact with the Russian Embassy and known Russian intelligence officers,” Durham continued.
Humorously, the FBI apparently decided to throw all caution to the wind in 2017 despite knowing exactly what Danchenko was about in 2008.
Either that, or the Clinton payroll was just too attractive.
Much to the detriment of Americans, as noted by Retired Assistant Director for Intelligence Kevin Brock.
“This is more than just political dirty tricks. Political dirty tricks usually have some foundation in truth. But they just made stuff up,” Brock remarked, in reference to Danchenko and Clinton’s falsehoods.
Danchenko played a primary role in the “Trump-Russia collusion” rumors spreading like wildfire, and he insisted to the FBI he was reporting information out of so-called concern.
Danchenko did not reveal the Clintons put him up to the lies, which is precisely why Brock refers to in terms of “making stuff up.”
“This is the way disinformation is really exposed, not by some contrived government agency, but by evidence presented in court that gets at the truth of what happened. What Durham is methodically doing, is laying out a case that the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democrat Party used contrived disinformation in a conspiracy, in a conspiratorial way, to deceive the American voter ahead of the election,” Brock warned.
In other words, the shadiest swamp creatures will stop at nothing, including putting Russian intel on the payroll, when it comes to undermining their perceived political opponents, whether said opponent is Trump or someone else entirely.
Which is why Americans must remain more vigilant than ever about what the news is reporting … and what it isn’t. And doing everything in their power to preserve the union …
Author: Jane Jones