Just when you thought the Supreme Court seemed vehemently opposed to deportations of all varieties, it seems that the nation’s highest court has just handed a long overdue victory to the Trump administration.
Indeed, it would not be surprising if many conservatives had come to believe that the Supreme Court was playing a rather suspect game, especially following the notorious 1 a.m. ruling against a deportation flight filled with Venezuelan migrants.
Which enraged the Trump administration.
However, quite recently, the Supreme Court startled the entire nation – not to mention the liberal media – with its decisive action in favor of deporting hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans.
Even more interestingly, the Supreme Court effectively overruled U.S. District Judge Edward Chen n doing so.
Chen, yet another activist Obama appointee based in San Franscisco, blocked Trump’s efforts to remove 600,000 Venezuelans, claiming that such a mass deportation effort was – you guessed it – apparently based on “racism.”
“The Secretary made sweeping negative generalizations about Venezuelan TPS beneficiaries … Acting on the basis of a negative group stereotype and generalizing such stereotype to the entire group is the classic example of racism,” Chen raged in his decision.
Right.
Unfortuantely, that group’s entire government has long been vehemently opposed to the United States and a tad too cozy with American enemies.
And it would appear that the Supreme Court may well have seen the logic with Venezuela specifically, given its most recent decision.
“The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted. The March 31, 2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, case No. 3:25-cv-1766, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court,” the Supreme Court crisply remarked in a terse order.
According to a report from Politico, the Supreme Court apparently offered “no explanation.”
However, Politico also admitted that “Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the high court’s action, also without explanation.”
Naturally, University of California law professor Ahilan Arulanantham is outraged by the latest decision.
Arulanantham – one of the attorneys challenging the DHS’s deportation decisions – blasted “the largest single action” of deportations in United States history.
“This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking. The humanitarian and economic impact of the Court’s decision will be felt immediately, and will reverberate for generations,” Arulanantham ranted.
Well, to be fair, the invasion across the border may well be “the largest single” influx of illegals in modern history … which would call for an equivalent action in response.
Especially when considering a similar war on the West via illegal migration unfolding across Europe as well …
Author: Jane Jones
