These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Tech CEO Issues Chilling Verdict On Comrade Kamala’s “Earrings”

Well, that escalated quickly.

Shortly after the debate, the Internet was flooded with a flurry of suspicion over Comrade Kamala’s performance.

Naturally, she had no substance to offer … but she did manage to put together a few sentences coherently while simultaneously vacillating through a bizarre array of expressions.

Which is precisely why many began theorizing that Ms. Kamala’s “earrings” were, in fact, Bluetooth microphones.

Specifically the NOVA H1 Audio Earrings, which also feature a pearl.

And, while the media was quick to dismiss such speculation as false or effective disinformation, a tech CEO has shockingly upended the media’s endless defense of the indefensible.

As reported by the Daily Mail, the NOVA H1 Audio Earrings may be defined as “two tiny high-end microphones are integrated into each Earring providing the user with crystal clear phone calls and wind-noise cancelation.”

Quite clearly similar to Ms. Kamala’s earrings.

However, the more troubling verdict is the one reached directly by Malte Iversen, who serves as the managing director of the NOVA-manufacturing Icebach Sound.

Rather hilariously, Iversen remarked that he can neither “confirm nor deny” if the effectively communist presidential candidate was wearing the “audio earrings” … which actually do exist.

“We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it,” Iversen mused.

Well, no kidding.

Especially suited for a candidate whose brain is even emptier than her manly pantsuit.

“To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign,” Iversen added.

Right.

Except, unlike Comrade Kamala, Trump doesn’t need weeks of prep, nor does he need effective spyware implanted in his ear.

Whether or not Kamala really was using external assistance during the debate itself, it is quite clear she was given endless passes by the supposed “moderator.”

Little wonder that Trump looked rather resigned, though he also came across as vastly more presidential than Comrade Kamala.

And, needless to say, her impassioned performance has raised suspicion from more than one person.

“I find it interesting how much improvement from her CNN interview to last night. She stumbled through a taped interview where she answered questions for 16 minutes. She is suddenly able to make it through two hours. Doesn’t add up for me,” one commenter remarked.

Doesn’t really add up for anyone with any sense.

“So it appears that Harris is not going to be asked by the media what her plans are for the economy or what her foreign policies are going to be or what her plans for the nation are going to be or indeed anything else of importance. It’s just going to be one big joyful surprise for everyone if she gets elected,” another individual remarked.

A rather scary, yet accurate, assessment of the situation.

Then again, the media loves to misrepresent reality.

Thus, its portrayal of everyone adoring Comrade Kamala may well be even phonier than its claims regarding the optimal health of Biden, which were blown out the window after his disastrous debate with Trump.

Frankly, even if Harris herself admitted to using spyware during the debate, the media wouldn’t cover it … In fact, they would censor it.

Just like they attempted to do with Hunter’s “home videos.”

Author: Jane Jones


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More