Americans have known, for quite some time, that Liz Cheney is a political archenemy of top presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Her animosity towards him easily rivals that of Romney, and, as it turns out, can do a lot more damage.
Especially when accounting for the fact that multiple media reports have now surfaced regarding Cheney’s absent suppression of key evidence that would vindicate Trump in virtually all the Democrats’ ongoing “insurrection” claims.
Given that “insurrection” is the reason that the woke mob has used in its pitiable efforts to displace Trump from the ballot, it’s rather obvious that suppressing any evidence that vindicates Trump is yet another form of pitiable election interference.
Except this time, it’s within the Republican Party.
Trump has long insisted that he requested a number of National Guardsmen on January 6, well aware that the protests might spiral out of control given the deeply partisan nature of the impending presidential power transition.
Needless to say, Cheney has claimed the opposite, which is that Trump apparently had no interest in an elevated presence of the National Guard.
And not only has she claimed the opposite, she apparently attempted to suppress a closed door interview held with an individual whose testimony aligns with the claims of Trump, rather than Cheney.
Former Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato delivered testimony to the January 6 committee that upended one of the Democrats’ many favorite tall tales regarding that day.
Ornato recalled how former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows had urged the Washington, D.C. Mayor, Muriel Bowser, to request as many National Guardsmen as necessary for protecting the Capitol and other major buildings from the rising protests.
Specifically, per Ornato’s recollections, Meadows was greatly interested in knowing whether or not any more Bowser needed any more National Guardsmen.
“I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’ I remember that number,” Ornato informed the January 6 committee.
So much for Trump planning an “insurrection” while simultaneously asking for the assistance of 10,000 National Guardsmen.
Republican Representative Barry Loudermilk also supported Ornato’s claim.
“Mr. Ornato’s testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along, President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down …
“This is just one example of important information the former Select Committee hid from the public because it contradicted what they wanted the American people to believe … And, this is exactly why my investigation is committed to uncovering all the facts, no matter the outcome,” Loudermilk detailed.
Little wonder that Cheney wanted to suppress that information, as a request for 10,000 National Guardsmen is one of many ways to poke holes in the Dems’ pitiable claims regarding January 6.
Of course, woke Mayor Bower turned Trump down – anything to undermine the outgoing president.
“Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time,” Ornato added.
So, in other words, Trump requested up to 10,000 National Guardsmen, which was nearly thirty times as many as Bowser actually provided.
Given Bowser’s rabid anti-police position, this revelation is not entirely surprising.
What is surprising is the fact that Cheney believed she could keep this information wholly suppressed from the public.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
