You know things are getting tense in the White House when the wokest of woke outlets begin to question what really goes on behind closed doors in the White House. Specifically with regards to Biden selling out the nation for personal gain, using his son as a convenient gofer (and scapegoat).
Humorously, several of these outlets are the same outlets that claimed that Hunter’s laptops were “Russian disinformation,” when they were clearly anything but.
Once it was beyond evident that Hunter’s laptops are indeed Hunter’s laptops, the mainstream media then rapidly switched tactics, claiming that perhaps Hunter engaged in an array of multiple, potentially illegal, business deals overseas, but Emperor Biden had nothing to do with them.
Never mind the fact that Hunter would have never, ever interfaced with anyone of significance in Ukraine, Russia, China, Romania, and who knows how many other questionable nations, had his father not been the vice president to Emperor Obama, who is clearly licking his chops over the destruction he deliberately caused.
Alas, even that tactic, which effectively amounts to throwing Hunter under a bus to preserve “the Big Guy,” has proven to fall flat, especially following the dramatic implosion of Hunter’s plea deal.
Now, none other than the New York Times is questioning whether or not the president did, indeed, engage in very dirty dealings over the course of developing his alleged expertise in foreign policy.
Indeed, the New York Times White House correspondent Peter Bake admitted that Biden himself might have been involved in Hunter’s “wayward business dealings.”
“I think now of course it’s been a few years since then, more information has come out, more allegations have been made … Many of which of course have not yet been proven or confirmed. I think that narrative is a little harder to make right now, and so for President Biden, it’s not just about a wayward son, but about whether or not he himself had something to do with his wayward son’s business dealings, and that’s still an open question,” Bake remarked.
Indeed, it is. Though for most people with a brain, Biden’s involvement in his son’s dirty dealings was evident even before the Dems began harvesting ballots for the 2020 election.
Which means that Biden’s rather obvious involvement, if not direct engineering, of dirty business dealings is more like an “open and shut” case, rather than “an open question” for many.
Bake also blasted the White House Press Secretary for her clear dishonesty, noting how she had “changed [the] formulation” of her previous narrative, which changes every time the wind blows more evidence in the White House’s direction.
“The current president said that he never had even discussed business with his son. The White House press secretary this week changed that formulation a little bit to say he was never in business with his son. That’s a little bit different than what President Biden has said in the past. And we’ll see where it plays out,” Bake noted.
If the recent implosion of Hunter’s plea deal is anything to go by, then one can only hope that things will continue to “play out” before Biden drives the nation down any further.
Despite one of the most leftist media outlets starting to question the veracity of Biden’s overseas antics, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre continues to brazenly lie.
Almost humorously, she had the gall to blame Trump for Hunter’s plea deal falling apart … rather than blame Hunter for being the one to break the law(s) in the first place, alongside his utterly enabling father.
“Hunter Biden is a private citizen, and this was a personal matter for him … This case was handled independently, as all of you know, by the Justice Department under the leadership of a prosecutor appointed by the former president, President Trump,” Jean-Pierre angrily retorted, sneering at reporters for daring to ask about very real events that just transpired.
Events that just happen to be linked heavily to Ukraine … which is current the recipient of well over a hundred billion dollars’ worth of military “aid” that receives next to no accountability.
Then again, what else is to be expected from a “president” who leaves an estimated $90B in military hardware behind for the Taliban, who in turn have made a handsome profit off of taxpayer-funded military equipment in the international black market?
The same market that the president and his son, along with their entire families, are deeply, deeply familiar with.
And, at the current rate of global turmoil, the same market and foreign adversaries that the Biden regime is apparently deeply, deeply, indebted to … at the grave expense of national security.
Author: Ofelia Thornton
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
