Looks like Boston just wants to end each year on a loss, over and over again.
In late 2023, the formerly great city of Boston, Massachusetts made headlines due to its blatantly displayed racism against White people.
That’s right: Current Mayor Michelle Wu, the city’s “first” Asian-American female mayor, apparently decided to make racism her legacy by hosting a taxpayer-funded “Electeds of Color” party … a holiday party that deliberately excluded the White city council members in Boston.
Absolutely staggering display of brazen racism.
Wu 100% would have been out of her position by now if she were a white male … however, as a DEI candidate, she is apparently exempt from pesky those ethics codes.
And now, Wu is leading Boston down the rabbit hole once again, with her rather unsavory insistence upon endless sanctuary city status.
As reported by Blaze Media, the city council of Boston has unanimously voted in favor of the city remaining an endless recipient of illegal migrants.
City Council President Ruthzee Louijeune, who is unlikely to be personally impacted by her vote, was sure to brag about how great and woke the vote was.
“Together we’ll continue to stand with our immigrant neighbors and build a more inclusive Boston in the face of mass deportation threats,” Louijeune brayed.
Right.
Former Boston city councilor Josh Zakim, who wrote a sanctuary city law, said it was his proudest moment as a local lawmaker.
“I think in a time of polarization and hate and nastiness going back and forth, it’s important to remember what this law does here in the city of Boston. It simply removes our resources, our police officers, our funds from being used to enforce civil, not criminal, violations of federal immigration rules,” Zakim boomed.
That’s nice. Good to know that Boston is so vehemently opposed to using “resources” for protecting citizens.
“It’s not the job of the Boston Police Department or any City of Boston agency to spend our municipal resources and energy on doing something which has been proven time and time again to make us unsafe,” Zakim added indignantly.
With respect, what is he talking about? Exactly how is enforcing immigration law making anyone unsafe? If anything, not enforcing immigration law has led to a profound decline in public safety.
And, rather humorously, it’s easy for Boston, heck, the whole state of Massachusetts to double down on sanctuary city insanity when local and state officials call for various residents to open up their homes to so-called “newcomers.”
Even more disturbingly, the state does not even have any clear screening plans for either the newcomers or the hosts, which is a deeply problematic situation.
“The state’s new Family Welcome Center in Allston is tasked with recruiting, vetting and onboarding host families, as well as pairing them with the families in need …
[However,] the state did not immediately respond to requests for information about the vetting process for hosts, and whether there are site visits to assess the safety of host’s home. The state also did not provide information about how many families have been paired with hosts since the Family Welcome Center opened in late June,” WBUR reported.
Well, how about that?
What a brilliant way for hordes of undocumented illegals (including minors) to go missing … with great ease.
After all, if no one is vetting the hosts, and no one is vetting the “newcomers,” then who knows what could possibly be going on?
Alas, it seems that the super racist city council voted in favor of pro-human trafficking measures.
Though they will always insist they do nothing but vote in favor of woke.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
