These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Schiff Shores Up Anti-Trump Bile Amid Scandal

The new year has started with quite the bang, especially with at least two different sets of mishandled (or misappropriated) classified documents being found in Biden’s alleged “office” at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as beside his Corvette in a “locked garage.”

Who knows how many other documents are floating elsewhere, but something suggests more than one may have wafted its way across the darkroom tables of Hunter’s varied “business deals,” in which he offered no expertise but access.

Needless to say, leaving classified documents laying around the garage of a heavily trafficked house, especially with Hunter and Co. in tow, is probably not the wisest course of action in terms of national security.

Which is why Merrick Garland obviously had to appoint a special counsel, much to the rage of the left.

“On January 5, 2023, Mr. Lausch briefed me on the results of his initial investigation and advised me that further investigation by a special counsel was warranted. Based on Mr. Lausch’s initial investigation, I concluded that, under the special counsel regulations, it was in the public interest to appoint a special counsel,” Garland intoned.

Once that occurred, Democrats apparently had to say something about the rapidly unfolding crisis rather than just ignore it and wait for it to go away, as they do in 99.99 percent of most cases.

So, California Democrat Adam Schiff made an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” where he somehow managed to admit Biden may have endangered national security while also deflecting constantly to Trump the entire time.

“I do think it’s the right move,” Schiff began in response to questions about Garland’s special counsel appointment, “the attorney general has to make sure that not only is justice evenly applied, but the appearances of justice are also satisfactory to the public. And here, I don’t think he had any choice but to appoint a special counsel. And I think that special counsel will do the proper assessment.”

Well, gee, Mr. Schiff, thank you for the lesson in Justice 101 … “the attorney general has to make sure … justice is evenly applied?” Genius!

“I still would like to see Congress do its own assessment of – and receive an assessment from the intelligence community of whether there was an exposure to others of these documents, whether there was harm to national security, on the case of either set of documents with either president,” Schiff stammered.

Ah. Of course. Be sure to bring up Trump at all costs, no matter what, as some kind of bizarre excuse for the continuous failures under Biden.

“I don’t think we can exclude the possibility without knowing more of the facts,” Schiff continued with regards to Biden’s potential endangerment of national security.

Of course, Schiff had to bring up Trump again, near immediately.

“We have asked for an assessment in the intelligence community of the Mar-a-Lago documents,” Schiff added.

Keep on talking about Trump until you’re blue in the face, Schiff.

He’s not the one busted with classified documents on Ukraine … while also sending tens of billions of unaccounted for taxpayer sums to Ukraine.

“I think we ought to get that same assessment of the documents found in the – in the think tank, as well as the home of President Biden. I’d like to know what these documents were. I’d like to know what the IC’s assessment is, whether there was any risk of exposure and what the harm would be and whether any mitigation needs to be done,” Schiff prattled on.

Notice how he’s saying the same thing over and over? Almost like he’s trying to fill three minutes of airtime with thirty seconds of content.

And, to ensure he makes his full “airtime,” who do you think Schiff brings up, yet again, after briefly referring to Biden?

“I think that would be appropriate and consistent with what we requested in the case of Mar-a-Lago,” Schiff concluded.

Ah. Start with Trump, end with Trump. Never fully examine Biden. The standard Democrat way.

It will be interesting to see if a sudden “crisis” arises in the next few weeks, all designed to deflect attention from Biden.

Kind of like how Biden just sent several billion more to Ukraine on the downlow while Republicans duked it out in the House.

Author: Ofelia Thornton


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More