“Consent for genocide is manufactured here.”
That was the recent proclamation of yet another well-funded Pro-Palestine mob, who disrupted yet another business.
And while it is natural to assume the mob was targeting a conservative organization, it turns out the militants were waging war against none other than the New York Times itself.
“According to law enforcement, a group of pro-Palestinian agitators gathered outside one of the nation’s largest newspaper printing facilities around 1 a.m. on Thursday to create a blockade. The protesters prevented delivery trucks from accessing the building by standing in the road with their arms linked … The demonstrators placed rocks and office furniture on the roadway to further disrupt the delivery truck drivers,” The Blazereported.
How about that. After all, the anti-Trump newspaper, which undoubtedly played a substantial role in the outcome of the 2020 election (and by default, the current geopolitical crisis), had zero issue with multiple parts of the nation being shut down by protestors in 2016 … who also “questioned” the results. In fact, demanded for the election to be overturned.
Now, it seems the media outlet is getting a taste of its own medicine, from the very monster it helped to create.
The protest had been organized by Writers Against the War on Gaza, one of the many groups undoubtedly linked to George Soros in some way or another.
An activist named Harry asserted that the goal was to prevent the New York Times from being circulated on that particular day in order to “create a vacuum where other things are possible.”
“We’re trying to take the Times out of circulation for a day … People view it as this repository of objective knowledge, but it’s actually at the forefront of manufacturing consent for this war. We want to challenge that, and create a vacuum where other things are possible,” Harry declared.
So, in other words, Harry is accusing the anti-Trump newspaper of spreading disinformation. Hilarious.
What’s even more hilarious is the response of the New York Times.
“The Israel-Hamas war is a complex and challenging story, and we receive criticism from each side. We are open to good-faith disagreement but firmly reject any assertion that our coverage displays bias. We support the rights for groups and individuals to express their point of view, even when we disagree with it as it relates to our coverage, but will not let critics or advocacy campaigns sway us from independent reporting,” the newspaper retorted.
“Independent reporting?” Is that what leftist propaganda is called these days?
Talk about Orwellian doublespeak.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
